<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" ><generator uri="https://jekyllrb.com/" version="3.9.1">Jekyll</generator><link href="https://blog.uncooperative.org/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" /><link href="https://blog.uncooperative.org/" rel="alternate" type="text/html" /><updated>2026-08-03T15:29:32+00:00</updated><id>https://blog.uncooperative.org/feed.xml</id><title type="html">The Uncoöperative Organization</title><author><name>Peter Jones</name></author><entry><title type="html">Secure Boot — Fedora, RHEL, and shim upstream maintenance: government involvement or lack thereof</title><link href="https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/08/03/shim-info.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Secure Boot — Fedora, RHEL, and shim upstream maintenance: government involvement or lack thereof" /><published>2026-08-03T15:29:11+00:00</published><updated>2026-08-03T15:29:11+00:00</updated><id>https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/08/03/shim-info</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/08/03/shim-info.html">&lt;p&gt;You probably remember when I said some things about Secure Boot in June of 2014.  I said there’d be more along those lines, and there is.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So there’s another statement about that &lt;a href=&quot;/shim-info-2026-08-03.txt.asc&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’m going to try to remember to post a message like this once per month
or so.  If I miss one, keep an eye out, but maybe don’t get terribly
suspicious unless I miss several in a row.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Note that there are parts of this chain I’m &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; a part of, and obviously
linux distributions I’m not involved in that support Secure Boot.  I
encourage other maintainers to offer similar statements for their
respective involvement.&lt;/p&gt;</content><author><name>Peter Jones</name></author><category term="UEFI" /><category term="Secure Boot" /><category term="Linux" /><category term="shim" /><summary type="html">You probably remember when I said some things about Secure Boot in June of 2014. I said there’d be more along those lines, and there is.</summary></entry><entry><title type="html">Secure Boot — Fedora, RHEL, and shim upstream maintenance: government involvement or lack thereof</title><link href="https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/07/02/shim-info.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Secure Boot — Fedora, RHEL, and shim upstream maintenance: government involvement or lack thereof" /><published>2026-07-02T17:46:11+00:00</published><updated>2026-07-02T17:46:11+00:00</updated><id>https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/07/02/shim-info</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/07/02/shim-info.html">&lt;p&gt;You probably remember when I said some things about Secure Boot in June of 2014.  I said there’d be more along those lines, and there is.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So there’s another statement about that &lt;a href=&quot;/shim-info-2026-07-02.txt.asc&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’m going to try to remember to post a message like this once per month
or so.  If I miss one, keep an eye out, but maybe don’t get terribly
suspicious unless I miss several in a row.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Note that there are parts of this chain I’m &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; a part of, and obviously
linux distributions I’m not involved in that support Secure Boot.  I
encourage other maintainers to offer similar statements for their
respective involvement.&lt;/p&gt;</content><author><name>Peter Jones</name></author><category term="UEFI" /><category term="Secure Boot" /><category term="Linux" /><category term="shim" /><summary type="html">You probably remember when I said some things about Secure Boot in June of 2014. I said there’d be more along those lines, and there is.</summary></entry><entry><title type="html">Secure Boot — Fedora, RHEL, and shim upstream maintenance: government involvement or lack thereof</title><link href="https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/06/02/shim-info.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Secure Boot — Fedora, RHEL, and shim upstream maintenance: government involvement or lack thereof" /><published>2026-06-02T21:20:42+00:00</published><updated>2026-06-02T21:20:42+00:00</updated><id>https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/06/02/shim-info</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/06/02/shim-info.html">&lt;p&gt;You probably remember when I said some things about Secure Boot in June of 2014.  I said there’d be more along those lines, and there is.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So there’s another statement about that &lt;a href=&quot;/shim-info-2026-06-02.txt.asc&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’m going to try to remember to post a message like this once per month
or so.  If I miss one, keep an eye out, but maybe don’t get terribly
suspicious unless I miss several in a row.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Note that there are parts of this chain I’m &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; a part of, and obviously
linux distributions I’m not involved in that support Secure Boot.  I
encourage other maintainers to offer similar statements for their
respective involvement.&lt;/p&gt;</content><author><name>Peter Jones</name></author><category term="UEFI" /><category term="Secure Boot" /><category term="Linux" /><category term="shim" /><summary type="html">You probably remember when I said some things about Secure Boot in June of 2014. I said there’d be more along those lines, and there is.</summary></entry><entry><title type="html">Secure Boot — Fedora, RHEL, and shim upstream maintenance: government involvement or lack thereof</title><link href="https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/05/05/shim-info.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Secure Boot — Fedora, RHEL, and shim upstream maintenance: government involvement or lack thereof" /><published>2026-05-05T14:00:49+00:00</published><updated>2026-05-05T14:00:49+00:00</updated><id>https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/05/05/shim-info</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/05/05/shim-info.html">&lt;p&gt;You probably remember when I said some things about Secure Boot in June of 2014.  I said there’d be more along those lines, and there is.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So there’s another statement about that &lt;a href=&quot;/shim-info-2026-05-05.txt.asc&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’m going to try to remember to post a message like this once per month
or so.  If I miss one, keep an eye out, but maybe don’t get terribly
suspicious unless I miss several in a row.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Note that there are parts of this chain I’m &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; a part of, and obviously
linux distributions I’m not involved in that support Secure Boot.  I
encourage other maintainers to offer similar statements for their
respective involvement.&lt;/p&gt;</content><author><name>Peter Jones</name></author><category term="UEFI" /><category term="Secure Boot" /><category term="Linux" /><category term="shim" /><summary type="html">You probably remember when I said some things about Secure Boot in June of 2014. I said there’d be more along those lines, and there is.</summary></entry><entry><title type="html">Secure Boot — Fedora, RHEL, and shim upstream maintenance: government involvement or lack thereof</title><link href="https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/03/31/shim-info.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Secure Boot — Fedora, RHEL, and shim upstream maintenance: government involvement or lack thereof" /><published>2026-03-31T14:28:02+00:00</published><updated>2026-03-31T14:28:02+00:00</updated><id>https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/03/31/shim-info</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/03/31/shim-info.html">&lt;p&gt;You probably remember when I said some things about Secure Boot in June of 2014.  I said there’d be more along those lines, and there is.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So there’s another statement about that &lt;a href=&quot;/shim-info-2026-03-31.txt.asc&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’m going to try to remember to post a message like this once per month
or so.  If I miss one, keep an eye out, but maybe don’t get terribly
suspicious unless I miss several in a row.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Note that there are parts of this chain I’m &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; a part of, and obviously
linux distributions I’m not involved in that support Secure Boot.  I
encourage other maintainers to offer similar statements for their
respective involvement.&lt;/p&gt;</content><author><name>Peter Jones</name></author><category term="UEFI" /><category term="Secure Boot" /><category term="Linux" /><category term="shim" /><summary type="html">You probably remember when I said some things about Secure Boot in June of 2014. I said there’d be more along those lines, and there is.</summary></entry><entry><title type="html">Secure Boot — Fedora, RHEL, and shim upstream maintenance: government involvement or lack thereof</title><link href="https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/03/02/shim-info.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Secure Boot — Fedora, RHEL, and shim upstream maintenance: government involvement or lack thereof" /><published>2026-03-02T14:56:17+00:00</published><updated>2026-03-02T14:56:17+00:00</updated><id>https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/03/02/shim-info</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/03/02/shim-info.html">&lt;p&gt;You probably remember when I said some things about Secure Boot in June of 2014.  I said there’d be more along those lines, and there is.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So there’s another statement about that &lt;a href=&quot;/shim-info-2026-03-02.txt.asc&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’m going to try to remember to post a message like this once per month
or so.  If I miss one, keep an eye out, but maybe don’t get terribly
suspicious unless I miss several in a row.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Note that there are parts of this chain I’m &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; a part of, and obviously
linux distributions I’m not involved in that support Secure Boot.  I
encourage other maintainers to offer similar statements for their
respective involvement.&lt;/p&gt;</content><author><name>Peter Jones</name></author><category term="UEFI" /><category term="Secure Boot" /><category term="Linux" /><category term="shim" /><summary type="html">You probably remember when I said some things about Secure Boot in June of 2014. I said there’d be more along those lines, and there is.</summary></entry><entry><title type="html">Secure Boot — Fedora, RHEL, and shim upstream maintenance: government involvement or lack thereof</title><link href="https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/02/02/shim-info.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Secure Boot — Fedora, RHEL, and shim upstream maintenance: government involvement or lack thereof" /><published>2026-02-02T15:25:21+00:00</published><updated>2026-02-02T15:25:21+00:00</updated><id>https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/02/02/shim-info</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/02/02/shim-info.html">&lt;p&gt;You probably remember when I said some things about Secure Boot in June of 2014.  I said there’d be more along those lines, and there is.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So there’s another statement about that &lt;a href=&quot;/shim-info-2026-02-02.txt.asc&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’m going to try to remember to post a message like this once per month
or so.  If I miss one, keep an eye out, but maybe don’t get terribly
suspicious unless I miss several in a row.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Note that there are parts of this chain I’m &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; a part of, and obviously
linux distributions I’m not involved in that support Secure Boot.  I
encourage other maintainers to offer similar statements for their
respective involvement.&lt;/p&gt;</content><author><name>Peter Jones</name></author><category term="UEFI" /><category term="Secure Boot" /><category term="Linux" /><category term="shim" /><summary type="html">You probably remember when I said some things about Secure Boot in June of 2014. I said there’d be more along those lines, and there is.</summary></entry><entry><title type="html">Secure Boot — Fedora, RHEL, and shim upstream maintenance: government involvement or lack thereof</title><link href="https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/01/02/shim-info.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Secure Boot — Fedora, RHEL, and shim upstream maintenance: government involvement or lack thereof" /><published>2026-01-02T14:45:28+00:00</published><updated>2026-01-02T14:45:28+00:00</updated><id>https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/01/02/shim-info</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2026/01/02/shim-info.html">&lt;p&gt;You probably remember when I said some things about Secure Boot in June of 2014.  I said there’d be more along those lines, and there is.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So there’s another statement about that &lt;a href=&quot;/shim-info-2026-01-02.txt.asc&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’m going to try to remember to post a message like this once per month
or so.  If I miss one, keep an eye out, but maybe don’t get terribly
suspicious unless I miss several in a row.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Note that there are parts of this chain I’m &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; a part of, and obviously
linux distributions I’m not involved in that support Secure Boot.  I
encourage other maintainers to offer similar statements for their
respective involvement.&lt;/p&gt;</content><author><name>Peter Jones</name></author><category term="UEFI" /><category term="Secure Boot" /><category term="Linux" /><category term="shim" /><summary type="html">You probably remember when I said some things about Secure Boot in June of 2014. I said there’d be more along those lines, and there is.</summary></entry><entry><title type="html">Secure Boot — Fedora, RHEL, and shim upstream maintenance: government involvement or lack thereof</title><link href="https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2025/12/02/shim-info.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Secure Boot — Fedora, RHEL, and shim upstream maintenance: government involvement or lack thereof" /><published>2025-12-02T14:45:10+00:00</published><updated>2025-12-02T14:45:10+00:00</updated><id>https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2025/12/02/shim-info</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2025/12/02/shim-info.html">&lt;p&gt;You probably remember when I said some things about Secure Boot in June of 2014.  I said there’d be more along those lines, and there is.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So there’s another statement about that &lt;a href=&quot;/shim-info-2025-12-02.txt.asc&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’m going to try to remember to post a message like this once per month
or so.  If I miss one, keep an eye out, but maybe don’t get terribly
suspicious unless I miss several in a row.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Note that there are parts of this chain I’m &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; a part of, and obviously
linux distributions I’m not involved in that support Secure Boot.  I
encourage other maintainers to offer similar statements for their
respective involvement.&lt;/p&gt;</content><author><name>Peter Jones</name></author><category term="UEFI" /><category term="Secure Boot" /><category term="Linux" /><category term="shim" /><summary type="html">You probably remember when I said some things about Secure Boot in June of 2014. I said there’d be more along those lines, and there is.</summary></entry><entry><title type="html">Secure Boot — Fedora, RHEL, and shim upstream maintenance: government involvement or lack thereof</title><link href="https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2025/11/03/shim-info.html" rel="alternate" type="text/html" title="Secure Boot — Fedora, RHEL, and shim upstream maintenance: government involvement or lack thereof" /><published>2025-11-03T15:12:57+00:00</published><updated>2025-11-03T15:12:57+00:00</updated><id>https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2025/11/03/shim-info</id><content type="html" xml:base="https://blog.uncooperative.org/uefi/secure%20boot/linux/shim/2025/11/03/shim-info.html">&lt;p&gt;You probably remember when I said some things about Secure Boot in June of 2014.  I said there’d be more along those lines, and there is.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So there’s another statement about that &lt;a href=&quot;/shim-info-2025-11-03.txt.asc&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I’m going to try to remember to post a message like this once per month
or so.  If I miss one, keep an eye out, but maybe don’t get terribly
suspicious unless I miss several in a row.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Note that there are parts of this chain I’m &lt;em&gt;not&lt;/em&gt; a part of, and obviously
linux distributions I’m not involved in that support Secure Boot.  I
encourage other maintainers to offer similar statements for their
respective involvement.&lt;/p&gt;</content><author><name>Peter Jones</name></author><category term="UEFI" /><category term="Secure Boot" /><category term="Linux" /><category term="shim" /><summary type="html">You probably remember when I said some things about Secure Boot in June of 2014. I said there’d be more along those lines, and there is.</summary></entry></feed>